Descrição
There are any number of defensible arguments in support of President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. troops from northeastern Syria. It is safe to assume that Trump didn’t consider any of them. Instead, Trump seems to have acted as ever on impulse, out of a misguided sense that his instinct is a better guide than strategic planning and historical literacy. His decision reveals not an infallible instinct but a failure to understand three core elements of American power: assurance, deterrence and leverage. To begin with the theoretical arguments in support of withdrawing from northeastern Syria, first and foremost, the []
Trump's Syria threats won't scare Bashar al-Assad. He's in this
False Security: Trump and the Ten Commandments (Plus One) of the
Trump blames Putin, Obama for 'Animal Assad,' tweets 'big price
Trump downplays U.S. alliance with Syrian Kurds, saying 'they didn
World Politics Review
Friends become enemies': Trump's Syria strike stirs up alt-right
Trump: US never agreed to protect Syrian Kurd allies 'for the rest
Trump Asked to Provide Legal Justification for Syria Attack
Trump Had Power to Attack Syria Without Congress, Justice Dept
Trump defends decision to abandon Kurdish allies in Syria
McCain: Trump 'emboldened' Assad with comments on US withdrawal
Trump sends warning to Assad and his allies against Syrian
Israel, Great Britain, Saudi Arabia and other allies praise
de
por adulto (o preço varia de acordo com o tamanho do grupo)
